• The Confessions of Adam ~ A Novel
  • A Conversation: Genesis 2-4
  • About ~ Contact
  • Revel and Rant ~ A Column on the Craft of Fiction
  • Press Kit
  • Read This: Recommendations
  • Most Importantly

David J. Marsh

~ Biblical Narrative ~ Literary Fiction

Category Archives: Character in Fiction

Charismatic Characters

10 Wednesday Aug 2022

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Creative Process/Craft, Technicalities

≈ Leave a comment

What I am offering here is not mine. It is Charles Baxter’s.* I am bringing it here because it was an epiphany for me (or whatever the word is for a crystalized way of thinking about something one already knows experientially).

Baxter was speaking of charisma. He was wondering what makes someone charismatic, and how a charismatic character translates to the page. He stated that a reader cannot sufficiently experience a charismatic character on the page. Charisma requires that you be there, in the room, under the influence. 

He went on to explain that the way a reader experiences a charismatic character is by the effect that character has on other characters. It is through observation of these impacts the reader will come to understand a character as charismatic.

This is a fascinating realization.

In thinking about this further, it seems this is true of any psychologically hefty character. One who is charismatic, sociopathic, prophetic—all of these will be experienced by the reader indirectly, via that character’s impact on the other characters in the story.

Thank you, Mr. Baxter, for this lesson. Anytime we can obtain insight into how readers read fiction or how fiction works during that act of consumption, the better writers we will be.

*As presented to Sarah Enni on her podcast, “First Draft,” episode dated 1 August 2022. 

The Invention of Character

15 Wednesday Jul 2020

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Creative Process/Craft, Role of the Writer, Starting a Novel

≈ Leave a comment

There are many examples for writing students of exercises and worksheets through which to create characters. Do a search in Google Images for “character creation worksheet.” 

Are you overwhelmed? Close your browser. Let’s talk about how working writers get this done.

People present themselves in what they say and what they do. These are a result of beliefs and experiences. And all of this is alive, complex, and full of contradictions. 

We know very little of people when we first meet. We learn through doing life with them, through conversations, through time spent together. It’s a slow process. But a rewarding one. It’s what gives much of our life meaning. A person’s hobbies or where they went to school? These are simple trivia. Their tics and idiosyncrasies, their moments of insight and magnificent blunders––these are what endear them to us.

Characters are people. They are dynamic, not static. Characters aren’t developed, they’re ever-developing. I knew nearly nothing about Oren when I began to write my novel The Confessions of Adam. I knew simply that he was from Susa, a master scribe, and a proud skeptic. All of these details came by necessity of the story. Oren walked onto the set. That is how we met.

As I wrote, I learned much more about Oren. I learned his father and he had a difficult relationship. I learned his son and he did as well. I learned about his tragic romantic life, his insecurities, and loneliness. These were dimensions of him I learned through the writing, through listening, in time spent with him––not ones I invented writing a character sketch. This is life, not a lab.

Oren became a friend. He was from a culture, time, and place unlike my own. He was at once ancient and modern. I listened to what he said, how he said it, and I came to better understand him as I wrote these down. I am convinced there are nooks and crannies of Oren I know nothing about, depths of his psyche and complexities of thought he intentionally holds back, ones he himself doesn’t yet understand, or doesn’t know how to share.

When you view a character in a story you’re writing just as you would a new acquaintance, and in time, an old friend (or enemy), you have a fully developing character.

The Presence of Person

13 Wednesday Dec 2017

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction

≈ Leave a comment

A fellow writer of mine recently wrote a poem about the first year of her marriage and the challenges that arise when two people throw in their lot together.

There is a great deal of bravery in writing about those we love – those people closest to us – whether we love them or not. It is not just the bravery of putting such things on paper – of making a record of them, but the bravery due to what happens when we write. When we write we learn. And sometimes we uncover things we’d rather not know – things more difficult than those with which we initially sat down.

When we write about people – real or fictional – they become more real to us than when we started. We create them, or interpret them, and they become a thing from which we cannot look away. Our investment in them grows and they become integral to the engine of our story.

This is part of our superpower. We write and that which was elusive, only given a nod, occurred behind closed doors, is unveiled – it is illuminated and exposed.
And it is never the same again.

The Power of Place

29 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Qualities of Good Fiction, Role of the Writer

≈ Leave a comment

Among the elements of fiction – conflict, character, and place – I could argue for any one of them being the more palpable, the key to quality story. Conflict is the engine. No question about that. But place…world-building…the environment in which the story happens – that is central.

I have a fellow writer who recently wrote a poem about walking through the Atlanta airport and how alone she felt among so many people. There is so much truth in that. How does that happen? How does a place illicit universal feeling and emotion? How do our psyches and souls become intertwined with physical spaces?
And it seems that the further you go back, into youth and then into childhood, the greater this phenomena becomes. Pause in those memories and place will tug, transport, and consume.

Place is unique among the elements of fiction. Practice reverence in constructing where your stories will unfold. And know that if the place you create lifts off the page it could, just maybe, transform into a character.
And that would be a gift.

How to Say You’re Lonely

08 Wednesday Feb 2017

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Emily St. John Mandel, Qualities of Good Fiction

≈ Leave a comment

On November 30th, at Butler University I had the privilege of hearing Eric Freeze read from his collection of stories called Invisible Men. During the introduction, one of Eric’s students stated that Eric gave the following writing advice during a recent graduate fiction workshop:
“If you’re feeling lonely, don’t tell us you’re lonely. If you describe your surroundings with enough care the emotion will surface.”
This bit of advice struck me as profound. I think it is the first time I’ve heard the ancient writing adage “show don’t tell” adequately explained.
Eric’s advice proves out. Descriptions are never neutral, never objective. They always bear the mark of the one doing the describing – they always (if done “with enough care”) make the mind of the character visible. The emotion comes through in the details that are provided as well as those that are not. Description is a series of choices – both conscious and subconscious.
How about a quick example?
Here are the first two sentences of Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven. “The king stood in a pool of blue light, unmoored. This was act 4 of King Lear, a winter night at the Elgin Theatre in Toronto.”
What does this description reveal about the mood of the narrator and the tone of the novel that follows? What do these opening choices suggest? What do you make of the description’s mention that it’s act 4 and wintertime? Are we reading a romance? I doubt it. Detective fiction? Not likely. You’ll not be surprised to learn that this is a literary post-apocalyptic novel.
The mood is set from the first line. No tell. All via careful description.

But It Is Fundamental

02 Wednesday Nov 2016

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Qualities of Good Fiction

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Characterization, Fiction, Writing

I know that I’ve written on this in at least one other post, but it is fundamental, so I trust you’ll humor me.

Yesterday I made the following note in my commonplace book.

“I think that most of the power in fiction comes of revelation to the reader and keeping characters in the dark.”

It is rare, but there are times as a writer (or practitioner of any craft) that you realize you have come to know a small but critical thing about that which you strive to do; and that you know this small thing with utmost confidence.

Yesterday I had such a moment. And it was at that moment that I wrote the above phrase in my notebook.

This statement is true. I have learned it as a mathematician learns the Pythagorean Theorem, a chemist learns the Meissner Effect, or a carpenter learns the terrific benefits of the dovetail joint. I have applied it and it works. Every time. It is a law of the craft. It is a fact that I can count on. It is an objective truth. I did not invent it or imagine it. I cannot exploit it nor fully explain it. It does not belong to me. It is simply a characteristic of the nature of successful fiction.

So be on your way. Go, and test this truth yourself.

PPP

10 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by davidjmarsh in Action in Fiction, Character in Fiction, Ralph Ellison

≈ Leave a comment

In 1954, Ralph Ellison told the Paris Review* that a character’s development must proceed through three states: from purpose, through passion, to perception^.

The beauty of this construct is that it demands action. And action is the stuff of story. No action = no story. A character will, by their very creation, exist; however action will give the character purpose, a reason for existing. Through further action the character will declare their passion – their want – the target of their desire. Finally, out of this character’s action, and reaction to conflict, will come a perception, maybe even an epiphany. The character will be reinvented, forever changed. The character will be unable to return to that early state of simple purpose even if he wished, for purpose and passion are permanently altered due to the new found perception.
An example would be good here, but you don’t need me for that. Think of your favorite novel or short story. Think of Huck Finn or Goldilocks, think of your favorite TV show or movie. From purpose, through passion, to perception – it is right there.
It’s why you love that story.

*I am slowly reading all of the interviews in the Paris Review backlog. They are all available online. http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews. I am glad I got an MFA. Reading these I feel like I’m earning my doctorate.

^Ellison says in the interview that he is quoting Kenneth Burke.

Backstory Isn’t Story

20 Wednesday Apr 2016

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Contract with the Reader, Qualities of Good Fiction

≈ Leave a comment

You will try to make your reader care about the character you’ve created. You’ll do this by telling your reader all about the character’s background, family, where he lives, his personality, clothing, job, and who knows what else. You’ll lay all of this out for your reader in great detail. You’ll do this at the top of the first page. You’ll do this before you tell them the story. You’ll do this because they have to know. They have to know all of this before they can appreciate what you have to tell them.

Go ahead. Do this. Tell them all of it.

Now, delete it.

There. You’ve gotten that out of your system.

Now start again. Show the reader your character in the heat of the moment, dealing with conflict, caught in the middle of some action. Do this starting in the first sentence.
Do this well and your reader will care about the character you’ve created while knowing nothing else.

How do we know that this is true? We know because before we were writers we were readers. And this is why we care about characters. This is why we’ve cared about characters for years.

If you still want proof, go to the library and check out Cormac McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men.
You’ll meet Llewelyn Moss at the top of page one hunting antelope. It will not be until page 20 that you’ll find out he lives in a trailer with a woman. And even then you won’t know anything else, except they aren’t part of the social elite and Moss isn’t a sissy. On page 12 Moss will find a bunch of dead guys and on page 17 he will find another dead guy and a bag full of cash. And this stuff matters. It matters because back on page one, during the hunt, you started caring about this guy. You didn’t start caring on page 20.

As Ben H. Winters said over lunch on March 10, 2016 at LePeep’s on 71st St. in Indianapolis – always put backstory in later, and if possible, never.

On [The Illusion of] Character

27 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction

≈ 2 Comments

Oren’s life is like our own*. It is not a series of events, but rather his life occupies a space in time and is constructed of soul + DNA + experience, within and influenced by a community – a cast of other characters.
However, characters in novels cannot be written with the complexity of real people. If I attempt to write a character with all the interior life and mixed motivations of a real person, I’ll not only overwhelm the story but my reader as well. I won’t create a realistic character; I’ll create a muddy persona without shape and lacking individuality.
Characters in stories are presented through a series of reveals – concrete, strategically chosen facts, and declared motivations – which (if we do our best work) give the reader the illusion that all the complexity of a life exists between the lines and off camera.
A key element enters here for the writer: we must know more of the character than is on the page.
The writer must know the character’s life story – as deeply as possible – in order to authentically present snippets of his/her life to the reader. Here’s a loose metaphor – in order to most effectively treat a patient a doctor strives to know the history of that patient and as much as possible about their lifestyle past and present. None of this detail may be addressed in the patient’s care – discussed or further explored in any way – but care for the patient’s present complaint will be most accurate and lasting with this knowledge in hand.
Similarly, writers write about characters – their history, habits, lifestyle (sometimes called a character sketch) – to learn about them. This meta-writing isn’t intended to ever be part of the story, but it is how we learn about characters, how we discover them and sculpt them so that we can create for our readers the illusion of a real story about a real person.

*Except that Oren is a character in my novel-in-progress. He is a master scribe from the ancient city of Susa.

9 Reasons Dialogue = Good Writing

30 Wednesday Jan 2013

Posted by davidjmarsh in Character in Fiction, Creative Process/Craft

≈ 1 Comment

I wrote a short story this week. It may be the most dialogue-heavy piece I’ve ever written. I’ve been thinking a lot about dialogue. It is the nervous system of good writing.

There is a fellow at work who is very interesting to look at. He has a certain (we’ll call it) style about him that makes it really hard not to stare. I find the guy fascinating. But, recently I heard him speak for the first time. Holy cow – he is ten times more interesting! His speech, his voice, the sound – it turned him from a curio into a human.

Anyone up for a list?

9 Reasons Dialogue = Good Writing

  1. Dialogue is the primary way the reader learns about a character.
  2. Dialogue is the primary way the characters learn about each other.
  3. Dialogue is the best way to keep the writer off the page. It favors observation over judgment. We all need help with that.
  4. Dialogue is the only way a character’s voice can be conveyed.
  5. Dialogue is more fun to write. Characters can say anything they want and good craft demands they not be ignored.
  6. Dialogue is flexible. It can be spoken, thought, or both – and the spoken and thought don’t have to match!
  7. Dialogue makes it harder for you (the writer) to control the story. We all need help with that too.
  8. Boring dialogue stands out like a sore thumb. We all know what a boring person sounds like. This assists with the next draft.
  9. Dialogue offers endless opportunities for creativity. There are 313 million people in the U.S. There are 313 million distinct voices.

Email List

Want a sneak peek at my debut novel? Subscribe.




I promise not to spam you or sell your email address. EVER.

- Dave

Revel and Rant ~ The Craft of Fiction

Revel and Rant ~ Archive

Revel and Rant ~ Most Recent Posts

  • When to Write and When to Read
  • Over A Decade of Blogposts
  • Imago Dei

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Like the Facebook Page!

Like the Facebook Page!

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.

 

Loading Comments...